In the last couple of decades transportation systems analysis (TSA) has emerged as a
recognized profession.
More and more government organizations, universities, researchers, consultants,
and private industrial groups around the world are becoming truly multi-modal
in their orientation and are as opting a systematic approach to transportation
problems.
I have added stuff here.
Multi-modal: Covering all modes or transport; air, land, and sea
and both passenger and freight.
Multi-sector: Encompassing the problem,s and viewpoints of
government, private industry, and public.
Multi-problem: Ranging across a spectrum of issues that includes
national and international policy, planning of regional system, the location
and design of specific facilities, carrier management issues, regulatory,
institutional and financial policies.
Multi-objective: National and regional economic development, urban
development, environment quality, and social quality, as well as service to
users and financial and economic feasibility.
Multi-disciplinary: Drawing on the theories and methods of
engineering, economics, operation research, political science, psychology,
other natural and social sciences, management and law.
Planning range: Urban transportation planning, producing long
range plans for 5-25 years for multi-modal transportation systems in urban
areas as well as short range programs of action for less than five years.
Passenger transport: Regional passenger transportation, dealing
with inter-city passenger transport by air, rail, and highway and possible with
new modes.
Freight transport: routing and management, choice of different
modes of rail and truck.
International transport: Issues such as containerization,
inter-modal co-ordination.
In spite of the diversity of problems types, institutional contexts and
technical perspectives their is an underlying unity: a body of theory and set
of basic principles to be utilizes in every analysis of transportation systems.
The core of this is the transportation system analysis approach.
The focus of this is the interaction between the transportation and activity
systems of region.
This approach is to intervene, delicately and deliberately in the complex
fabric of society to use transport effectively in coordination with other
public and private actions to achieve the goals of that society.
For this the analyst must have substantial understanding of the transportation
systems and their interaction with activity systems; which requires
understanding of the basic theoretical concepts and available empirical
knowledge.
The methodological challenge of transportation systems is to conduct a
systematic analysis in a particular situation which is valid, practical, and
relevant and which assist in clarifying the issues to debated.
The core of the system analysis is the prediction of flows, which must be
complemented by the predication for other impacts.
Refer Fig. 1
Predication is only a part of the process of analysis and technical analysis is
only a part of the broader problem, and the role of the professional
transportation system analysis is to model the process of bringing about changes in the
society through the means of transport.
The strong interrelationship and the interaction between transportation and
the rest of the society especially in a rapidly changing world is significant to
a transportation planner.
Among them four critical dimensions of change in transportation system can be
identified; which form the background to develop a right perspective.
Change in the demand: When the population, income, and land-use
pattern changes, the pattern of demand changes; both in the amount and spatial
distribution of that demand.
Changes in the technology: As an example, earlier, only two
alternatives (bus transit and rail transit) were considered for urban
transportation. But, now new system like LRT, MRTS, etc offer a variety of
alternatives.
Change in operational policy: Variety of policy options designed
to improve the efficiency, such as incentive for car-pooling, road pricing etc.
Change in values of the public: Earlier all beneficiaries of a
system was monolithically considered as users. Now, not one system can be
beneficial to all, instead one must identify the target groups like rich, poor,
young, work trip, leisure, etc.
The first step in formulation of a system analysis of transportation system is
to examine the scope of analytical work.
The basic premise is the explicit treatment of the total transportation system
of region and the interrelations between the transportation and socioeconomic
context.
P1
The total transportation system must be viewed as a single
multi-modal system.
P2
Considerations of transportation system cannot be separated
from considerations of social, economic, and political system of the region.
This follows the following steps for the analysis of transportation system:
S1 Consider all modes of transportation
S2 Consider all elements of transportation like persons, goods,
carriers (vehicles), paths in the network facilities in which vehicles are
going, the terminal, etc.
S3 Consider all movements of movements of passengers and goods
for every O-D pair.
S4 Consider the total tip for every flows for every O-D over all
modes and facilitates.
As an example consider the the study of inter-city passenger transport in metro
cities.
Consider all modes: i.e rail, road, air, buses, private automobiles,
trucks, new modes like LRT, MRTS, etc.
Consider all elements like direct and indirect links, vehicles that can
operate, terminals, transfer points, intra-city transit like taxis, autos,
urban transit.
Consider diverse pattern of O-D of passenger and good.
Consider service provided for access, egress, transfer points and
mid-block travel etc.
Once all these components are identified, the planner can focus on elements
that are of real concern.
Transportation system is tightly interrelated with socio-economic system.
Transportation affect the growth and changes of socio-economic system, and will
triggers changes in transportation system.
The whole system of interest can be defined by these basic variables:
The transportation system including different modes,
facilities like highways, etc.
The socio-economic activity system like work, land-use,
housing, schools, etc.
Activity system is defined as the totality of social, economic, political, and
other transactions taking place over space and time in a given region.
The flow pattern which includes O-D, routes, volume or
passenger/goods, etc.
Three kinds or relationships can be identified as shown in Fig. 2
and can be summaries as follows:
is determined by and .
Current will cause changes over time in through the pattern of
and through the resources consumed in providing .
Current will also cause changes over time in due to changes in
Note that is not a simple variable as it looks. Also note that
transportation is not the sole agency causing changes in .
The mode of fulfilling the objective of intervening the system of TAF is
important.
The three major player in the TAF system are:
User The users of the transportation system will decided when
where and how to travel.
Operator The operator of a particular facility or service operator
will decide the mode of operation, routes, schedule, facilities, etc.
Government Government will decided on taxes, subsidies,
construction of new facilities, governing law, fares, etc.
Their intervention can be in either transportation or activity system.
The transportation options available to impart changes in the system are:
Technology (eg. articulated bus, sky bus, etc.);
Network (eg. grid or radial);
Link characteristics (eg. signalized or flyover at an intersection);
Vehicles (eg. increase the fleet size);
System operating policy (eg. increase frequency or subsidy); and
Organizational policy (eg. private or public transit system in a city).
On the other hand, some of the activity options are:
Travel demand which is the aggregate result of all the individual
travel decisions.
The decision can be travel by train or bus, shortest distance route or shortest
travel time route, when (time) and how (mode) to travel, etc.
Other options Most of the social, economic, and political actors
in the activity system decide when, how, or where to conduct activities.
For example, the choice of school is affected by the transportation facility, or
the price of real estate influenced by the transportation facilities.
The impacts of the transportation and activity options mentioned above diverse
impact as illustrated in fig. 3
Any proposed change in transportation system will trigger a change in system
activity which needs a procedure to predict the impacts.
The impact depend upon the pattern of flows resulting from particular flows.
The core of any TSA is th prediction of changes in flows which is the most
significant impact of change in transportation system.
Consider present transportation system and activity system .
A particular change in transportation system will be defined in terms of
changes in .
(1)
Initially, , , and exist in an equilibrium, i.e., specification of
transportation system at any point in time and of activity system
implies the pattern of flows, .
The basic hypothesis underlying this statement is that there is a market for
transportation which can be separated out from other markets.
This is type 1 relationship and can be separated out from type 2 and type 3 relationships (Fig. 2).
Introducing two more variables, the first indicated the service characteristics
expressed by like travel time, fare, comfort, etc. which is denoted as
and the volume of flow in the network denoted as , following relations can
be stated.
Specification of transportation system establishes service function
which indicate how the level of service varies as a function of the
transportation option and the volume of flows; i.e.
(2)
Specification of the activity system options, establishes demand
function, , which gives the volume of flow as function of activity system
and level of service; i.e.
(3)
The flow pattern consists of the volume using the system and
level of service ; i.e.
(4)
for a particular and , the flow pattern that will actually occur can be
found by the solution of service function and demand function: