To figure out the exact relationship between the traffic parameters, a great deal of research has been done over the past several decades. The results of these researches yielded many mathematical models. Some important models among them will be discussed in this chapter.
Macroscopic stream models represent how the behaviour of one parameter of traffic flow changes with respect to another. Most important among them is the relation between speed and density. The first and most simple relation between them is proposed by Greenshield. Greenshield assumed a linear speed-density relationship as illustrated in figure 1 to derive the model.
The equation for this relationship is shown below.
![]() | (1) |
where v is the mean speed at density k, vf is the free speed and kj is the jam density. This equation ( 1) is often referred to as the Greenshield’s model. It indicates that when density becomes zero, speed approaches free flow speed (ie. v → vf when k → 0).
Once the relation between speed and flow is established, the relation with flow can be derived. This relation between flow and density is parabolic in shape and is shown in figure 3. Also, we know that
![]() | (2) |
Now substituting equation 1 in equation 2, we get
![]() | (3) |
Similarly we can find the relation between speed and flow. For this, put k = in equation 1
and solving, we get
![]() | (4) |
This relationship is again parabolic and is shown in figure 2. Once the relationship between the fundamental variables of traffic flow is established, the boundary conditions can be derived. The boundary conditions that are of interest are jam density, free-flow speed, and maximum flow. To find density at maximum flow, differentiate equation 3 with respect to k and equate it to zero. ie.,
![]() | (5) |
Therefore, density corresponding to maximum flow is half the jam density. Once we get k0, we can derive for maximum flow, qmax. Substituting equation 5 in equation 3
Thus the maximum flow is one fourth the product of free flow and jam density. Finally to get the speed at maximum flow, v0, substitute equation 5 in equation 1 and solving we get,
![]() | (6) |
Therefore, speed at maximum flow is half of the free speed.
In order to use this model for any traffic stream, one should get the boundary values, especially free flow speed (vf) and jam density (kj). This has to be obtained by field survey and this is called calibration process. Although it is difficult to determine exact free flow speed and jam density directly from the field, approximate values can be obtained from a number of speed and density observations and then fitting a linear equation between them. Let the linear equation be y = a + bx such that y is density k and x denotes the speed v. Using linear regression method, coefficients a and b can be solved as,
Alternate method of solving for b is, where xi and yi are the samples, n is the number of samples, and and are the mean of xi and yi respectively.For the following data on speed and density, determine the parameters of the Greenshield’s model. Also find the maximum flow and density corresponding to a speed of 30 km/hr.
k | v |
171 | 5 |
129 | 15 |
20 | 40 |
70 | 25 |
Solution Denoting y = v and x = k, solve for a and b using equation 8 and equation 9. The solution is tabulated as shown below.
x(k) | y(v) | (xi - ) | (yi - ) | (xi - )(yi - ) | (xi -2) |
171 | 5 | 73.5 | -16.3 | -1198.1 | 5402.3 |
129 | 15 | 31.5 | -6.3 | -198.5 | 992.3 |
20 | 40 | -77.5 | 18.7 | -1449.3 | 6006.3 |
70 | 25 | -27.5 | 3.7 | -101.8 | 756.3 |
390 | 85 | -2947.7 | 13157.2 | ||
= =
= 97.5, =
=
= 21.3. From equation 9, b =
= -0.2 a = y -b =
21.3 + 0.2×97.5 = 40.8 So the linear regression equation will be,
![]() | (10) |
Here vf = 40.8 and = 0.2. This implies, kj =
= 204 veh/km. The basic parameters of
Greenshield’s model are free flow speed and jam density and they are obtained as 40.8 kmph
and 204 veh/km respectively. To find maximum flow, use equation 6, i.e., qmax =
=
2080.8 veh/hr Density corresponding to the speed 30 km/hr can be found out by
substituting v = 30 in equation 10. i.e, 30 = 40.8 - 0.2 × k Therefore, k =
= 54
veh/km.
In Greenshield’s model, linear relationship between speed and density was assumed. But in field we can hardly find such a relationship between speed and density. Therefore, the validity of Greenshield’s model was questioned and many other models came up. Prominent among them are Greenberg’s logarithmic model, Underwood’s exponential model, Pipe’s generalized model, and multi-regime models. These are briefly discussed below.
Greenberg assumed a logarithmic relation between speed and density. He proposed,
![]() | (11) |
This model has gained very good popularity because this model can be derived analytically. (This derivation is beyond the scope of this notes). However, main drawbacks of this model is that as density tends to zero, speed tends to infinity. This shows the inability of the model to predict the speeds at lower densities.
Trying to overcome the limitation of Greenberg’s model, Underwood put forward an exponential model as shown below.
![]() | (12) |
where vf is the free flow speed and k0 is the optimum density. The model can be graphically expressed as in figure 5. is the free flow speed and ko is the optimum density, i.e. the density corresponding to the maximum flow.
In this model, speed becomes zero only when density reaches infinity which is the drawback of this model. Hence this cannot be used for predicting speeds at high densities.
Further developments were made with the introduction of a new parameter (n) to provide for a more generalized modeling approach. Pipes proposed a model shown by the following equation.
![]() | (13) |
When n is set to one, Pipe’s model resembles Greenshield’s model. Thus by varying the values of n, a family of models can be developed.
All the above models are based on the assumption that the same speed-density relation is valid for the entire range of densities seen in traffic streams. Therefore, these models are called single-regime models. However, human behaviour will be different at different densities. This is corroborated with field observations which shows different relations at different range of densities. Therefore, the speed-density relation will also be different in different zones of densities. Based on this concept, many models were proposed generally called multi-regime models. The most simple one is called a two-regime model, where separate equations are used to represent the speed-density relation at congested and uncongested traffic.
The flow of traffic along a stream can be considered similar to a fluid flow. Consider a stream of traffic flowing with steady state conditions, i.e., all the vehicles in the stream are moving with a constant speed, density and flow. Let this be denoted as state A (refer figure 6. Suddenly due to some obstructions in the stream (like an accident or traffic block) the steady state characteristics changes and they acquire another state of flow, say state B. The speed, density and flow of state A is denoted as vA, kA, and qA, and state B as vB, kB, and qB respectively.
The flow-density curve is shown in figure 7.
The speed of the vehicles at state A is given by the line joining the origin and point A in the graph. The time-space diagram of the traffic stream is also plotted in figure 8.
All the lines are having the same slope which implies that they are moving with constant speed. The sudden change in the characteristics of the stream leads to the formation of a shock wave. There will be a cascading effect of the vehicles in the upstream direction. Thus shock wave is basically the movement of the point that demarcates the two stream conditions. This is clearly marked in the figure 7. Thus the shock waves produced at state B are propagated in the backward direction. The speed of the vehicles at state B is the line joining the origin and point B of the flow-density curve. Slope of the line AB gives the speed of the shock wave (refer figure 7). If speed of the shock-wave is represented as ωAB, then
![]() | (14) |
The above result can be analytically solved by equating the expressions for the number vehicles leaving the upstream and joining the downstream of the shock wave boundary (this assumption is true since the vehicles cannot be created or destroyed. Let NA be the number of vehicles leaving the section A. Then, NA = qB t. The relative speed of these vehicles with respect to the shock wave will be vA - ωAB. Hence,
![]() | (15) |
Similarly, the vehicles entering the state B is given as
![]() | (16) |
Equating equations 15 and 16, and solving for ωAB as follows will yield to:
![]() | (17) |
In this case, the shock wave move against the direction of traffic and is therefore called a backward moving shock wave. There are other possibilities of shock waves such as forward moving shock waves and stationary shock waves. The forward moving shock waves are formed when a stream with higher density and higher flow meets a stream with relatively lesser density and flow. For example, when the width of the road increases suddenly, there are chances for a forward moving shock wave. Stationary shock waves will occur when two streams having the same flow value but different densities meet. traffic parameters. These models were based on many assumptions, for instance, Greenshield’s model assumed a linear speed-density relationship. Other models were also discussed in this chapter. The models are used for explaining several phenomena in connection with traffic flow like shock wave. The topics of further interest are multi-regime model (formulation of both two and three regime models) and three dimensional representation of these models.
Concentration(veh/km) | Speed(kmph) |
180 | 4 |
140 | 20 |
30 | 50 |
75 | 35 |
Speed (kmph) | Density (veh/km) |
5 | 150 |
20 | 120 |
30 | 100 |
40 | 70 |
Speed (kmph) | Density (veh/km) |
5 | 120 |
20 | 90 |
30 | 40 |
40 | 10 |
Speed (kmph) | Density (veh/km) |
10 | 200 |
20 | 170 |
30 | 120 |
40 | 100 |
I wish to thank several of my students and staff of NPTEL for their contribution in this lecture. I also appreciate your constructive feedback which may be sent to tvm@civil.iitb.ac.in
Prof. Tom V. Mathew
Department of Civil Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India
_________________________________________________________________________
Monday 21 August 2023 12:19:12 AM IST